Yesterday I posted about using WordPress.com Reader to keep up with your content. So, what about blogs that aren’t part of WordPress that you’re interested in? That’s where the old fashioned RSS Feed Readers still serve well!
I’ve been using Feed Readers since before the demise of Google Reader, and I still lament the loss. I’m confused as to why they shut it down, but I assume money. Anyhow, it was a huge inconvenience, and it forced me to look for alternatives.
Hello Feedly, Goodbye Feedly
Back in 2015, I wrote a post about using Feedly as my reader. It quickly became the go-to replacement for Google Reader for a lot of folks. It imported all my feeds easily, and was a great service. Until…
They forced monetization into the system.
Feedly Pro had been a thing for a while, but I ignored it. I’m sorry, but I’m not going to pay for a feed reader. I’ve been using readers for years for free, so that’s just how it goes.
Then, one day last year, I went to add a feed to my Feedly, and got denied. What was this?
I did research and discovered this:
Wait a second. So free accounts can only have 100 sources and 3 feeds? I’m confused by this. What’s a source and how is it different from a feed?
I don’t know, but I did understand one thing…
While they didn’t remove any of the feeds I currently subscribed to, I was faced with the reality that I’d hit a limit and couldn’t add new feeds to my reader. Needless to say, I went reader shopping that day and found an alternative pretty easily.
My current reader is Inoreader.
This one may not work for everyone because the free version is supported by ads. And in order to use the reader, it does force you to whitelist the reader domain in your ad blocker. I know from a past post that a few folks out there feel pretty strongly against this, but I put up with it for the sake of…
150 feeds for the free account.
And to be honest, they offer a $20 yearly package for 500 feeds and no ads, which isn’t terrible. So far, I haven’t had any issue with the 150 feed limit, but I don’t hold on to feeds that go inactive for super long.
BUT, if I were to upgrade, I think I’d fork over the yearly $20 sooner than I would a monthly fee. Yeah, I know above I just said I’m not paying for a reader (and I’m not), but this is the most likely case if I did.
Right now, this is the reader I recommend. There might be other good ones out there – if so, let me know in the comments – but this works for me. If you want to know more about how to set up your feeds in Inoreader, check out their comprehensive help!
- Pennsylvania Game Commission targets deer and turkey feeding
- Big question answered: The value of recycling
- Nintendo introduces Switch Lite, a cheaper version of the Switch
- Big question answered: Remembering that first job
- Readers share their wackiest impulse purchases
- 2019 Readers’ Choice BBQ Bracket: Second Round Voting Has Begun
- Fox Scores Big Win in Netflix Poaching Suit
- Readers sound off on word ‘racist’
- Readers share Kiss makeup photos
- Mountain View firm captures UC Davis’ ‘Big Bang!’ prize